• Custom User Avatar

    This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

  • Custom User Avatar

    This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

  • Custom User Avatar

    Yo PLEASE unlock that for Python 3. Took me long enough to find out why all my answers are changed to 0 out of nowhere when it worked fine on my PC.

    Reason is that Python 2 handles the '/' operator different than Python 3

  • Custom User Avatar

    This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

  • Custom User Avatar

    Hey could I get the number n at which the error occurs? Currentely I cannot recreate the error on my machine. At some random numbers I get an error, example:

    Hihger Values of n (From 1000000 up to 5000000)
    1048447 should equal 1288849

    Unfortunately it does not tell me what n was.

    Running numbers through my code bigger than the ones given always gives me the right answer. I'm kinda hung up here. I'll leave my code in a reply to this comment.

  • Custom User Avatar

    I need a bit of a headstart here? I can't just use itertools.permutations, but neither can I write a self prolonging nested for loop.

    Does anyone have a bit of advice for me?

  • Custom User Avatar

    This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

  • Custom User Avatar

    You're right, sorry. I am using Python.

  • Custom User Avatar

    This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

  • Custom User Avatar

    This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

  • Custom User Avatar

    Isn't that a bit too easy for a 6kyu kata?

  • Custom User Avatar

    So what does he want? I stared at it for longer than 5 minutes and am not willing to stare at it another 5.

  • Custom User Avatar

    Yeah the author is probably laughing maniacally right now.
    While 1111111112 does give you 12345678987654321 the next one
    1111111111
    2 gives 1234567900987654321 and not 1234567890987654321.

    The author never said that the lines in the pattern always follow this amazing fact. He just put it there to confuse us I guess. What he wants is just the pattern independently of this fact.

  • Custom User Avatar

    Yeah the author is probably laughing maniacally right now.
    While 1111111112 does give you 12345678987654321 the next one
    1111111111
    2 gives 1234567900987654321 and not 1234567890987654321.

    The author never said that the lines in the pattern always follow this amazing fact. He just put it there to confuse us I guess. What he wants is just the pattern independently of this fact.

  • Custom User Avatar

    Am I the only one completely lost in the description? What does the author want of me?

  • Loading more items...