Actually, I think it still is, except that it implies that there are three objects given, (the first two of which are identical), so then it is wrong considering the literal specs.
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
1 and 2
its an Object
I agree. This teaches nothing but frustration and how to waste time.
Please do not forget to use spoiler tag next time.
As for your question: I am by not means expert here but I'd say it is indeed a common practice.
No, it isn't. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Century
@trashy_incel although you're right, the point "2000 is not the twentieth century." is still there.
there was no year 0
Loading collection data...
Actually, I think it still is, except that it implies that there are three objects given, (the first two of which are identical), so then it is wrong considering the literal specs.
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
1 and 2
its an Object
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
I agree. This teaches nothing but frustration and how to waste time.
Please do not forget to use spoiler tag next time.
As for your question: I am by not means expert here but I'd say it is indeed a common practice.
No, it isn't. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Century
@trashy_incel although you're right, the point "2000 is not the twentieth century." is still there.
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
there was no year 0