This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
Great idea!
Yeah you're totally right, it's very concise but not the most performant way. It could do with some kind of exit condition.
Nice! If you used join('') you wouldn't need the replaceAll.
Nice one!
Yes if you are going to use template literals, you need to use backticks!
Nice one! Great alternative to For loop.
Thank you! I was wondering how to do this. Didn't know you had to wrap the object in brackets.
It's because it's a test case that includes punctuation and spaces. Think this should be included in the description tbh.
Nice, more performant than my answer.
Definitely learned something from this Kata, thanks!
Ahhh I see it now, thank you!
Could someone explain the result of the if statement please?
I always forget about this way, nice one!
I was wondering why I couldn't get an arrow function to work with implicit return...thanks!
Loading collection data...
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
Great idea!
Yeah you're totally right, it's very concise but not the most performant way. It could do with some kind of exit condition.
Nice! If you used join('') you wouldn't need the replaceAll.
Nice one!
Yes if you are going to use template literals, you need to use backticks!
Nice one! Great alternative to For loop.
Thank you! I was wondering how to do this. Didn't know you had to wrap the object in brackets.
It's because it's a test case that includes punctuation and spaces. Think this should be included in the description tbh.
Nice, more performant than my answer.
Definitely learned something from this Kata, thanks!
Ahhh I see it now, thank you!
Could someone explain the result of the if statement please?
I always forget about this way, nice one!
I was wondering why I couldn't get an arrow function to work with implicit return...thanks!
Loading more items...