• Sign Up
    Time to claim your honor
  • Training
  • Practice
    Complete challenging Kata to earn honor and ranks. Re-train to hone technique
  • Freestyle Sparring
    Take turns remixing and refactoring others code through Kumite
  • Community
  • Leaderboards
    Achieve honor and move up the global leaderboards
  • Chat
    Join our Discord server and chat with your fellow code warriors
  • Discussions
    View our Github Discussions board to discuss general Codewars topics
  • About
  • Docs
    Learn about all of the different aspects of Codewars
  • Blog
    Read the latest news from Codewars and the community
  • Log In
  • Sign Up
kbuzzard Avatar
Name:Kevin Buzzard
Clan:Imperial College London
Skills:lean
Member Since:Apr 2020
Last Seen:Mar 2022
Profiles:
Following:147
Followers:171
Allies:144
View Profile Badges
  • Stats
  • Kata
  • Collections
  • Kumite
  • Social
  • Discourse
  • Conversations (74)
  • Replies
  • Authored
  • Needs Resolution
  • Custom User Avatar
    • StekiKun
    • commented on "Introduction to bijection, cardinality, and infinite sets" kata
    • 3 years ago

    I completely agree, this seems significantly easier than some of the other 4-kyu ranked puzzles out there. 6-kyu would seem more adequate.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • monadius
    • resolved an issue on "Generalised Pell x^2-37y^2=3" kata
    • 3 years ago

    Fixed

  • Custom User Avatar
    • monadius
    • resolved an issue on "(5^5^5^5^5-1)/(5^5^(5^5^5-1)-1) isn't prime" kata
    • 3 years ago

    Fixed

  • Custom User Avatar
    • ana-borges
    • commented on "Introduction to bijection, cardinality, and infinite sets" kata
    • 4 years ago

    Same for Coq. As far as I can tell there is no way to inspect the Preloded file, and the interface of codewards is completely inadequate. I managed to find the required definitions by Printing their names and "attempting" to solve the problem, which then shows the result of running the file. But this is really suboptimal.

    Edit: Ok, my bad, the definitions are provided in the comments of the problem. This still strikes me as a weird way to do it.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • donaldsebleung
    • created an issue for "Generalised Pell x^2-37y^2=3" kata
    • 5 years ago

    This Kata is not compatible with Lean 3.20.c as of 08/10/2020

  • Custom User Avatar
    • donaldsebleung
    • created an issue for "(5^5^5^5^5-1)/(5^5^(5^5^5-1)-1) isn't prime" kata
    • 5 years ago

    This Kata is not compatible with Lean 3.20.c as of 08/10/2020

  • Custom User Avatar
    • monadius
    • resolved an issue on "a^2=b^3+11" kata
    • 5 years ago

    Fixed

  • Custom User Avatar
    • monadius
    • resolved an issue on "(5^5^5^5^5-1)/(5^5^(5^5^5-1)-1) isn't prime" kata
    • 5 years ago

    Fixed

  • Custom User Avatar
    • donaldsebleung
    • created an issue for "a^2=b^3+11" kata
    • 5 years ago

    This Kata is not compatible with Lean v3.18.4 as of 16/08/2020 and needs to be upgraded.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • donaldsebleung
    • created an issue for "(5^5^5^5^5-1)/(5^5^(5^5^5-1)-1) isn't prime" kata
    • 5 years ago

    This Kata is not compatible with Lean v3.18.4 as of 16/08/2020 and needs to be upgraded.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • jorendorff
    • commented on "n(n+1)(4n-1)/6" lean solution
    • 5 years ago

    The extra cases n used here to make the -1s easier to get rid of is sweet! It's a very convenient way of replacing every n in a goal with n.succ.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • kbuzzard
    • commented on "New induction scheme on integers" kata
    • 5 years ago

    This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

  • Custom User Avatar
    • donaldsebleung
    • resolved a suggestion on "relating binary relations" kata
    • 5 years ago
  • Custom User Avatar
    • donaldsebleung
    • commented on "relating binary relations" kata
    • 5 years ago

    No worries - just leave it for now then.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • kbuzzard
    • commented on "relating binary relations" kata
    • 5 years ago

    If this comment is addressed to me, I am not sure I am confident enough with Coq syntax any more to know whether what you have done is OK (I haven't used Coq for about 2 years and I quickly forget things which I don't use a lot).

  • Loading more items...
  • © 2025 Codewars
  • About
  • API
  • Blog
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Code of Conduct
  • Contact

Confirm

  • Cancel
  • Confirm

Collect: undefined

Loading collection data...