• ###### IT-Knightcreated a question for "Maximum subarray sum" kata

This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

• ###### Aborja-devcreated a question for "Maximum subarray sum" kata

This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

• ###### JoJo10Smith10created a suggestion for "Maximum subarray sum" kata

This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

• ###### dthakkarcreated a question for "Maximum subarray sum" kata

This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

• ###### AlexTeloncreated an issue for "Maximum subarray sum" kata

This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

• ###### nmwhiteheadcreated a question for "Maximum subarray sum" kata

This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

• ###### MTwemcreated a suggestion for "Maximum subarray sum" kata

Description could be improved by mentioning that there is no set length of contiguous array, just try them all.

• ###### krishpcreated a question for "Maximum subarray sum" kata

What are we exactly supposed to do?

• ###### triskaidekaphilecreated a question for "Maximum subarray sum" kata

This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

• ###### Voilecreated an issue for "Maximum subarray sum" kata

Clojure version has no random tests.

• ###### AlexanderTserkovniycreated a suggestion for "Maximum subarray sum" kata

I would say, the main task was incorrectly written. Basically if you go the way how it is done in best clever solution, you just return a max value, but that is not a maximum range, instead it is just brutal mathematics to get maximum value of a range of numbers.

The way it should be written is "Return new array, which represents a range of maximum sum." and tests should be like this:

`Test.assertEqualDeep(maxSequence([-2, 1, -3, 4, -1, 2, 1, -5, 4]), [4, -1, 2, 1])`

JS.

• ###### RalfvdReithcreated a question for "shorter concat [reverse longer]" kata

This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

• ###### leilablcreated an issue for "shorter concat [reverse longer]" kata

I'm getting one failure when submitting this kata. But if I run that test case in the console I get the correct result. Any ideas?

• ###### stampficreated an issue for "shorter concat [reverse longer]" kata

Java Code works and test passes, BUT ->

Process was terminated. It took longer than 10000ms to complete

• ###### Gander7created an issue for "shorter concat [reverse longer]" kata

In the details, it was mentioned that input should not be null. I took that to mean that I should validate against null input. If your intent was for warriors to validate against null input maybe add a test case for it? If that wasn't your intent, could you clarify the details for future warriors?