In cricket, you cannot score after 10 wickets have fallen.

[0, 'W', 'W', 'w', 3, 'nb', 'W', 2, 'W', 'W', 'W', 1, 'nb', 4, 0, 3, 0, 1, 1, 3, 5, 3, 'W', 1, 0, 1, 'nb', 4, 'nb', 5, 'nb', 'W', 5, 1, 2, 2, 'W', 1, 'nb', 0, 'w', 3, 'W', 4, 4, 'w', 2, 'w']

'71/10 from 6.2'

I think a more clear description is needed
The requirements for this kata are hard to understand especially for some who knows nothing about cricket

Might make the task more interesting to add scoring off no balls/wides and (leg) bys? Right now you're testing a kinda weird subset of cricket scoring.

Thx! - corrected

Small note but fractional overs only go up to .5, 1 over 6 balls is 2 overs.

Description is in horrible shape with a lot of requirements in the wrong order or not presented clearly

• runs/wickets from overs.balls --> No explanation on run, wicket, over and balls && how to derive them

• 11 runs, one wicket/out from 1 over zero balls --> This is just a word-by-word explanation of the desired output without providing a step-by-step explanation on how to derive each calculation

• If a WIDE or a NOBALL is bowled, extra runs are assigned to the score, but the ball is re-bowled, meaning there is an extra ball in the array: --> No explanation on WIDE / NOBALL and how will the extra balls be added to the array (Front / back / irrelevant with its position)???

• Does not state whether run or wicket are explicitly counted towards over

• The maximum balls is 5, the minimum is 6 --> This does not make any sense and provided more confusion to the task (As previously An 'OVER' in cricket, is made of 6 'BALLS' has been mentioned)

• '5.0''5.1''5.2''5.3''5.4''5.5''6.0' --> This should be mentioned along with the OVER && BALL section, explicitly describing that every cycle of OVER can contain maximum 6 balls with additional balls written as a "decimal point" or after the . .

I'll raise an issue about that

I don't see how "overs" and "balls" are described. Also, the description is all over the place. There is no good structure.

did you miss the key section? The description didn't seem that bad to me...

edit: yeah, looks like most of the things are in wrong order (at least)

.

What a horrible description. I'm going through wiki to get specs for each of the terms you mentioned in the kata.

.

Similar, but not same - eg my Kata doesn't include extras

Hi !
I had always heard that cricket rules were so complicated that even the English did not understand them . . .
Fortunetly this kata shows us how false was this view ! ;))))