Not an issue
Then how is [1,3] a subsequence of [1,2,3] as stated in the example?
Hi, I'm the original author of this Kata (Ruby version). Author of the haskell version didn't understand this Kata properly, and indeed added a DFS version instead of BFS.
I have learned haskell to fix this. I added a BFS solution and a correct buildTree (thanks to @nickie for providing one). Please take a look again.
Cheers, I thought I'd tried that too, but there was a bug in the code. It's working now.
It isn't a set, but a sequence/list. The title "power set" is a little bit misleading. You need to return the set of all subsequences, not the set of all subsets, e.g.
-- 2nd zero 2nd zero
-- v v
power [0,0] = [, , , [0,0]]
-- ^ ^
-- 1st zero 1st zero
I've implemented a solution for this problem in Haskell, but when I submit it, it fails for tests with the input consisting of lists of zeros, eg, [0,0,0,0] or [0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0]. What is the expected solution for this? If this was a set, then this would be an invalid input since there can't be duplicates, correct? I'm removing any duplicates, which results in the set , which should have the power set [, ], but this is not being accepted. Any suggestions?
This has been reported several times, but the author isn't active anymore. See the issues by @muesli4, @karoyakani, @knotman90, @Thom and @pcapriotti.
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
I have a solution that works fine under ghci and gives the correct answer without any visible delay. However, when I paste it into the Codewars editor and run the test (the same data tested under ghci on my laptop), it says the the submission timed out. I don't think it's a performance issue since it works quite fast on a dual-core laptop (I'm not using any parallel libs, in fact nothing other thatn Prelude). Any suggestions?