• Sign Up
    Time to claim your honor
  • Training
  • Practice
    Complete challenging Kata to earn honor and ranks. Re-train to hone technique
  • Freestyle Sparring
    Take turns remixing and refactoring others code through Kumite
  • Community
  • Leaderboards
    Achieve honor and move up the global leaderboards
  • Chat
    Join our Discord server and chat with your fellow code warriors
  • Discussions
    View our Github Discussions board to discuss general Codewars topics
  • About
  • Docs
    Learn about all of the different aspects of Codewars
  • Blog
    Read the latest news from Codewars and the community
  • Log In
  • Sign Up
mandeepb Avatar
Name:Unknown
Clan:UAB
Member Since:Mar 2015
Last Seen:Oct 2024
Profiles:
Following:33
Followers:36
Allies:33
View Profile Badges
  • Stats
  • Kata
  • Collections
  • Kumite
  • Social
  • Discourse
  • Conversations
  • Replies (27)
  • Authored
  • Needs Resolution
  • Custom User Avatar
    • ejini战神
    • resolved a question on "Find the Mine!" kata
    • 2 years ago

    Your code fails for cases like [[0, 1], [0, 0]] because of your 2nd for loop finding 1 at index 1 of [0, 1] (inner). However, field[1] does not have 1 in it, hence the error!

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Ching Ching
    • resolved an issue on "Your Ride Is Here" kata
    • 7 years ago

    Not an issue.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Ahmed8Galal
    • commented on "Did I Finish my Sudoku?" kata
    • 7 years ago

    i have the same problem , could i know how i can figure it out?

  • Custom User Avatar
    • user2329161
    • commented on "Scrabble best word" kata
    • 8 years ago

    I'd second that. I actually found the 4 kyu sudoku validation exercise way easier than this.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • user5036852
    • resolved an issue on "Srot the inner ctonnet in dsnnieedcg oredr" kata
    • 9 years ago

    You should output the input string.
    I bet there was only one letter and you double it with your algorithm!

  • Custom User Avatar
    • maruru
    • commented on "Rustlings: Functions definition" kata
    • 9 years ago

    @brassington Why add the function? Just remove all code. Making stuff compile is trivial, if there is nothing which can fail. That's why I don't think this is a good Kata.

    Also, your TDD tests are still the default. Imho, you should at least give one example, like calling main and call_me successfully

  • Custom User Avatar
    • brassington
    • commented on "Rustlings: Functions return type" kata
    • 9 years ago

    Thanks for the feedback, there are still some ambiguities that need to be worked out. If possible can you describe any of the weird errors you ran in to? It's possible they were the compiler errors for Rust. Assuming they were the Rust compiler errors, maybe we I should include a word of warning/introduction to Rust compiler errors...

  • Custom User Avatar
    • brassington
    • commented on "Rustlings: Functions definition" kata
    • 9 years ago

    This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

  • Custom User Avatar
    • user4912975
    • commented on "Password System" kata
    • 9 years ago

    Hey buddy, thanks. Could you please elaborate the issue ?

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Goncalerta
    • commented on "Collatz Conjecture (3n+1)" kata
    • 9 years ago

    I don't really know what's wrong in your code, but apparently, codewars accepts it if you use directly n , instead of declaring a new variable number = n .

    But I have no idea why this happens...

  • Custom User Avatar
    • raulbc777
    • commented on "Reach Me and Sum my Digits" kata
    • 9 years ago

    Glad you liked it!

  • Custom User Avatar
    • WompWomp
    • commented on "Scrabble best word" kata
    • 9 years ago

    I think 6kyu is just about right

  • Custom User Avatar
    • raulbc777
    • commented on "Sum and Rest the Number with its Reversed and See What Happens" kata
    • 9 years ago

    What I can see is that you have some numbers that should not be there, 10890, 109890. Their corresponding reversed will have a leading 0 and the instructions say that you have to discard these terms. Correct this part and I'm pretty sure that you'll pass the tests.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • raulbc777
    • commented on "Sum and Rest the Number with its Reversed and See What Happens" kata
    • 9 years ago

    Hi @mandeepbhutani. Send me between backsticks a table with the numbers that you found.
    The format of the table:

    n     integer
    1       45
    2       54
    ..      ...
    ...     ...
    

    Thanks in advance for your time invested in this kata.
    (Do not forget to mark it with spoiler)

  • Custom User Avatar
    • taw
    • resolved a question on "Regexp basics - parsing time" kata
    • 10 years ago

    Now ponder "01:02:03\n".

  • Loading more items...
  • © 2025 Codewars
  • About
  • API
  • Blog
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Code of Conduct
  • Contact

Confirm

  • Cancel
  • Confirm

Collect: undefined

Loading collection data...