Correct me if I'm wrong but I think the description does not describe at all the actual task. With Hello World! :

• First, you need to reverse the string.

-> '!dlroW olleH'

• Then, the last character in the original string (the first character in the reversed string) needs to be moved to the back.

Last character in the original is ! (if we consider punctuation marks as, the description states; otherwise it would be d )
so -> 'dlroW olleH!' or '!lroW olleHd'

• Words will be separated by spaces, and punctuation marks can be counted as part of the word.

Why do you refer to words ? Why and how should we consider words? It's not question about words in the previous instructions.
If punctuation mark has to be counted as part of the world, why isn't it reversed just like the word itself?

How can we get lleHo dlroW! following those instructions ?

I think that
test.it("A voice in the background: \"We finally found the list and dictionary! The list reads: " + str(array) + " while the dictionary reads " + str(dictionary) + ". What I have just said is" + str(finished) + "\"")
should be
test.it("A voice in the background: \"We finally found the list and dictionary! The list reads: " + str(array) + " while the dictionary reads " + str(dictionary) + ". What I have just said is " + str(finished) + "\"")
as my output currently gives me ...What I have just said isTrue

We use the same method, but I am reminded that "specified syntax is not used"(while||do while)

array being a list ???

Nice !

The description seems a little data minerish?
Trivial as it might be I'd rather not see people revealing their real names and ages because of naivete and lack of cynicism.

Cool! I like it!) Good Job!!!

i feel like this test is to basic since you should know about functions and returns to get passed the problem when you sign up and this is teaching about ints and what not... idk it works tho

Cool I guess

the description and title are there, and they're 100% explanatory about the requirement

It doesn't matter what the author says (and however politely he does so), the true specifications are defined by the tests that the user has to pass; the description only serves as a warning about what the user will have to deal with. That's how TDD/BDD works, and how CW works respectively.

In fact, it's the author's fault that his "anticheat" is so weak, and you can bypass it easily.

Okay, fair enough. Parsing is another level of complexity though. And still, the description and title are there, and they're 100% explanatory about the requirement of using a "while" loop. So not having a test for it, is not an excuse. But that's just how I see it, fine with me if you have a different opinion on that.

Of course. You have access to the solution in /home/codewars/solution.txt. You can read that file and parse it.

But would it be possible to do it from the CodeWars unit tests environment?