BUT if the dog's closest bowls are at the same distance from him,
he will have to move and eat from the one that is farthest away from the dog closest to him.
... HOWEVER, if the two dogs surrounding him are at the same distance away from him, then the dog
will be confused and he'll stay in place, losing his turn to eat for that round.
Why exacly 2 dogs, what if more than 2 dogs are at the same distance?
What if the closest food to the left and right of the dog are at the same distance of the closest dog to our dog, what is the tie-breaker in this case? This case occurs if another dog is at the same location as the current dog.
Does our dog only get confused if multiple other dogs are at the same distance when some of them are to the left and some to the right of the dog, or also if all of them are on one side? Let's say two dogs are 1 unit to the left of the dog, and there is close food 2 units to the left, and 2 units to the right of our dog, should the dog go right, or get confused?
I solve all sample tests but practically none of the random tests (Python). This means the sample tests are not a good representation of what to expect in random tests.
why the dogs[2] don´t move to the nearest food on 3?
in the description say:
HOWEVER, if the two dogs surrounding him are at the same distance away from him, then the dog will be confused and he'll stay in place, losing his turn to eat for that round.
The random tests still print this instead of input:
Undocumented behavior:
I also end up with
[1, 3, 3, 3]
. I think this kata does not follow its own spec.I solve all sample tests but practically none of the random tests (Python). This means the sample tests are not a good representation of what to expect in random tests.
why the dogs[2] don´t move to the nearest food on 3?
in the description say:
HOWEVER, if the two dogs surrounding him are at the same distance away from him, then the dog will be confused and he'll stay in place, losing his turn to eat for that round.
perhaps that is the problem
Have you checked why the solution in the question below doesn't work?
solved, ty
.
Solved some problems in the python solution:
Python random tests have cases with one dog
In python function name should be snake_case (feed_the_dogs).
Python: the random tests print something else instead of the function arguments:
I fix all the issues long ago, but i can´t mark it as resolved. :(
I solve the issue in a fork, but don´t seems to be enough to mark it as resolved.
What i do bad?
Fixed!, Thanks
Why
feed_the_dogs([2, 5, 1, 3], [1, 2, 2, 0])
should be[1, 2, 3, 1]
(from random tests)?Python random tests have cases with one dog.
Python: the random tests print something else instead of the function arguments:
Loading more items...