• Sign Up
    Time to claim your honor
  • Training
  • Practice
    Complete challenging Kata to earn honor and ranks. Re-train to hone technique
  • Freestyle Sparring
    Take turns remixing and refactoring others code through Kumite
  • Community
  • Leaderboards
    Achieve honor and move up the global leaderboards
  • Chat
    Join our Discord server and chat with your fellow code warriors
  • Discussions
    View our Github Discussions board to discuss general Codewars topics
  • About
  • Docs
    Learn about all of the different aspects of Codewars
  • Blog
    Read the latest news from Codewars and the community
  • Log In
  • Sign Up
paulo_techie Avatar
Name:Paul Omondi
Clan:Unknown
Member Since:Sep 2019
Last Seen:Jun 2025
Profiles:
Following:3
Followers:0
Allies:0
View Profile Badges
  • Stats
  • Kata
  • Collections
  • Kumite
  • Social
  • Discourse
  • Conversations (17)
  • Replies
  • Authored
  • Needs Resolution
  • Custom User Avatar
    • Amangeldi.96
    • commented on "Last digit of a huge number" kata
    • 3 years ago

    I have exactly the same problem. I am using C#

  • Custom User Avatar
    • acid_bunny
    • commented on "Last digit of a huge number" kata
    • 3 years ago

    I have exactly the same problem

  • Custom User Avatar
    • paulo_techie
    • commented on "Sort and Star" kata
    • 4 years ago

    Yeah, I have seen the error. thanks.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • rowcased
    • commented on "Sort and Star" kata
    • 4 years ago

    are you doing this?

    charCodeAt(yourIndexHere)

    then do this:

    yourStringHere.charCodeAt(yourIndexHere)

  • Custom User Avatar
    • paulo_techie
    • commented on "Sort and Star" kata
    • 4 years ago

    I am getting this error in javascript: 'charCodeAt' is not defined? Am I mistaken that this is a javascript function?

  • Custom User Avatar
    • paulo_techie
    • commented on "Last digit of a huge number" kata
    • 4 years ago

    Thanks, let me think with that. Trying to figure out what scenario am ignoring with my formula.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • hobovsky
    • commented on "Last digit of a huge number" kata
    • 4 years ago

    What kind of hint would you need? Is this any helpful: https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=12%5E30%5E21 ?

  • Custom User Avatar
    • paulo_techie
    • commented on "Last digit of a huge number" kata
    • 4 years ago

    Am passing all tests except this one [[12, 30, 21], 6], ... Someone drop me a distant hint? Am using Ruby.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • paulo_techie
    • commented on "Nesting Structure Comparison" kata
    • 4 years ago

    I also don't get it: [1, "[", "]"] not same as ["[", "]", 1]

  • Custom User Avatar
    • paulo_techie
    • commented on "Nesting Structure Comparison" kata
    • 4 years ago

    I don't understand the logic here. Can someone explain?:

    should return true

    [ 1, [ 1, 1 ] ].same_structure_as( [ 2, [ 2, 2 ] ] )

    should return false

    [ 1, [ 1, 1 ] ].same_structure_as( [ [ 2, 2 ], 2 ] )

    should return true

    [1, [ , ] ] same as [ [ , ] ,1]

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Javatlacati
    • created a question for "Is my friend cheating?" kata
    • 4 years ago

    This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

  • Custom User Avatar
    • paulo_techie
    • commented on "Is my friend cheating?" kata
    • 4 years ago

    Yeah. That's what I did to pass the test. Hadn't seen it in the instruction. My bad.

  • Custom User Avatar
    • Chrono79
    • commented on "Is my friend cheating?" kata
    • 4 years ago

    [(a, b), ...] or [[a, b], ...] or {{a, b}, ...} or ... will be sorted in increasing order of the "a".

  • Custom User Avatar
    • paulo_techie
    • commented on "Is my friend cheating?" kata
    • 4 years ago

    Why does the test have an issue with the same result? I thought my code was wrong till I realized it is the same thing!

    Expected: [[550320, 908566], [559756, 893250], [893250, 559756], [908566, 550320]], instead got: [[559756, 893250], [893250, 559756], [550320, 908566], [908566, 550320]]

  • Custom User Avatar
    • paulo_techie
    • commented on "Battleship field validator" kata
    • 4 years ago

    Passed the tests without performing validations on instances where the ships are vertical. Only did validation for horizontal ships. Tests should be improved to cover that lapse.

  • Loading more items...
  • © 2025 Codewars
  • About
  • API
  • Blog
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Code of Conduct
  • Contact

Confirm

  • Cancel
  • Confirm

Collect: undefined

Loading collection data...