how about in the first part (1???x9)? I cannot find an exclusive rule in the description blocks this. (Please link the previous kata mention in the description also)
Thank you for reporting this. I have fixed it by reloading the imported modules. Feel free to comment again if you find any other way of bypassing the tests.
Resolved
Resolved
Thank you for your feedback. 👍
how about in the first part (
1???x9
)? I cannot find an exclusive rule in the description blocks this. (Please link the previous kata mention in the description also)How is
1???x9??1
not a valid digit pair yet there are three question marks between 1 and 9?Thanks for the tip, I have updated the kata accordingly.
I have taken it down. I am looking to make a complete refactor later on though it is quite hard to have secret varibles in python.
The nodejs version is Live!
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
Yeah, that wasn't what I was after. I will rewrite this kata in node js. Python is too open :-(. Awesome solution btw.
I believe the newest patch solves this issue and any variants like it.
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
They are similar in concept but the solution is quite different.
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
Thank you for reporting this. I have fixed it by reloading the imported modules. Feel free to comment again if you find any other way of bypassing the tests.
Loading more items...