Loading collection data...
Collections are a way for you to organize kata so that you can create your own training routines. Every collection you create is public and automatically sharable with other warriors. After you have added a few kata to a collection you and others can train on the kata contained within the collection.
Get started now by creating a new collection.
All languages obey this rule as of now, closing
OP solved it, closing
Approved
python new test framework is required. updated in this fork
That test doesn't exist in either the sample or full test suites. There is a similar one
-5x^2+10x+4
, for which the gradient is indeed -20; I think you've modified the tests and are now failing them because you modified them. Probably not a kata issue.is it just me or are some of the python tests just wrong?
this test (test.assert_equals(differentiate("-x^2+10x+4", 3), -20)) says that the slope of -x^2+10x+4 at point 3 is 20 when in reality it should be 4.
I calculated this myself and also let wolfram alpha do it: https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=derivative+of+-x%5E2%2B10x%2B4+at+3
I passed most tests, but a big part of them is still completely wrong. Am i not getting something here?
best!
✨
This kata is a subject to deduplication process here: https://github.com/codewars/content-issues/issues/203.
Please join the discussion to help us identify duplicate kata and retire them.
Really enjoyed the kata.
Used regex but didn't have full understanding of some functions and the syntax of regex but managed it nonetheless after spending some time printing the output of my regex splits.
Really brute forced this one and when I saw other solutions after solving, I realised how much I need to learn new libraries.
But thanks for the kata, it taught me a few new tricks.
Please add the fixed tests before the random to match the guidelines.
From Writing Submission Tests | The Codewars Docs:
language: ruby
are random test cases working? they seem to expect the same output as input (and not the decoded message)
My solution works for smaller numbers, but for larger numbers my solution yields generally the same number but with a few digits off. What could be causing the disparities?
Eval should be banned in that kata, it makes it easier than 4kyu
Python
Loading more items...