Skills:"ruby and python are on display this evening. if you'll just make that one stop with me first, i know you'll find it fascinating. and i'll get you to the falcon on time."
Each time when I run submit tests I get random test failures but when I try to run the same test in test playground it works for me. And the pressKeyCount in the failed test could be different, it includes a small number and number greater than 88
So iteresting kata, but from not native english warrior description is very difficult . At first, i can't understand how key will be pressed after 88: 1st or 88th, 87th and e.t.c.
I just tried your code in a fork and never had any problems, though... :o (apart from the fact that I don't know how you did submit this version since it doesn't compile (unsafe opeartion because you didn't decalre the type the list is holding) x)
I havent troubles - my solution accidentally passed tests.
ty for "abs" remark. Squaring gives positive result anyway.
UPD:
my result 9.055385138137417
in example 9.05538513814
my result 10.295630140987
Hi,
Each time when I run submit tests I get random test failures but when I try to run the same test in test playground it works for me. And the pressKeyCount in the failed test could be different, it includes a small number and number greater than 88
-> GO lang
Duplicate.
The sample tests are expecting the function to be named
encryptrather thaninitials.So iteresting kata, but from not native english warrior description is very difficult . At first, i can't understand how key will be pressed after 88: 1st or 88th, 87th and e.t.c.
It's just the shorthand if-else notation known as conditional expressions (aka ternary operator).
https://docs.python.org/3.7/reference/expressions.html#conditional-expressions
How it possible?
oh i didn't know this was possible
I like this!
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
I have some questions about your code. If the spin is ["Star","Wild","Wild"], your function will return 18 but the right result should be 10.
I have fixed this issue and republished the Ruby translation.
I just tried your code in a fork and never had any problems, though... :o (apart from the fact that I don't know how you did submit this version since it doesn't compile (unsafe opeartion because you didn't decalre the type the list is holding) x)
I havent troubles - my solution accidentally passed tests.
ty for "abs" remark. Squaring gives positive result anyway.
UPD:
my result 9.055385138137417
in example 9.05538513814
my result 10.295630140987
in example 10.295630141
I should have been more careful. Sorry.
java: the same computation is used, though (except for the abs). Check for another source of troubles?
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
Loading more items...