Thanks. I was pretty sure that I did check the spoiler flag, so I investigated further and found that when I click the text that says "Mark as having spoiler content" it doesn't actually mark it as having spoiler content. I have to actually click on the tiny checkbox. And that is true even though the pointer changes to a pointing-hand when hovering over the text, and the text is right next to the checkbox. Isn't it a UX standard at this point that clicking the text next to a checkbox will check the corresponding checkbox?

Your thoughts?

spoiler flag...

because of &age (double ref), should be only age

I didn't know the elegant maths for these series, so ended up doing a polynomial regression to solve summax/min. Sumsum was more straightforward.

You are correct. This Kata needs revisions

I used this part of the Wikipedia article about Pascal's triangle as a starting point, but others' far-more-elegant solutions used very different methods. I'd also be interested in more resources about this.

The initial Clojure code is misleading - we don't want a function websites, we want a vector. Yet if I'm not mistaken we start off with (defn websites []). Am I missing something?

Same problem in Firefox

I'm seeing HTML-escaped > symbols in kata previews in Chrome. See screenshot - when I click on the kata, those sequences correctly render as =>.

I have mixed feelings about that. Most kata would be dull if we could see the test cases ahead of time. But for this one I found it frustrating to write a perfectly valid number adder only to fail because the author wanted a number adder that works on numbers with leading zeroes. Eh.

Aw yeah.