"Distressing" or even "assaulted", plenty of uppercase, not admitting you might be wrong...
I would take a wild guess and assume you might not be too far from a uni, possibly an anglosaxon one.
Not sure about your language, but the initial signature is always 3 elements, so, unless you modify it, think again at what might happen.
But this has nothing to do with "it is GUARANTEED that the signature contains 3 values". It's distressing and unfair that the solver, counting on this guarantee, is assaulted with INCORRECT results because some of thie inputs DO NOT HAVE 3 values.
I was confused by the same thing. It could be more clear that the "n" is for the first "n" number(s) of the sequence - in an array.
Loading collection data...
"Distressing" or even "assaulted", plenty of uppercase, not admitting you might be wrong...
I would take a wild guess and assume you might not be too far from a uni, possibly an anglosaxon one.
Not sure about your language, but the initial signature is always 3 elements, so, unless you modify it, think again at what might happen.
But this has nothing to do with "it is GUARANTEED that the signature contains 3 values". It's distressing and unfair that the solver, counting on this guarantee, is assaulted with INCORRECT results because some of thie inputs DO NOT HAVE 3 values.
I was confused by the same thing. It could be more clear that the "n" is for the first "n" number(s) of the sequence - in an array.