great job !!
ouch , good job
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
so good, i nailed it.
I was just going to point out - good thinking Henry!
Nice! I used a reduce. But this is even more efficient. well done!
it asks just what it asks. it does not ask to foresee absence of the "needle"
Quite simply done
I think this is a good strategy but wouldnt it be better to cater for a case when an array that doesnt contain needle
if it does't find the needle then what? test fails! should explicitly check for if a needle is really present.
Loading collection data...
great job !!
ouch , good job
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
so good, i nailed it.
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
I was just going to point out - good thinking Henry!
Nice! I used a reduce. But this is even more efficient. well done!
it asks just what it asks. it does not ask to foresee absence of the "needle"
Quite simply done
I think this is a good strategy but wouldnt it be better to cater for a case when an array that doesnt contain needle
if it does't find the needle then what? test fails! should explicitly check for if a needle is really present.
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
Loading more items...