Thanks for enjoying :)

Python version broken (see below)

Ok, I'll raise an issue and you can resolve it when fixed.

Hi,
Possibly a mistake from on my side, but can I just check that the Python version is correct?
What does the C++ version get for this test case? I get 118 but the expected answer is 120.

[252675239, 362192384, 382111017, 102436662, 804562879, 67875051, 918098597, 550760272, 672682358, 562441881, 244526967, 988445274, 466603325, 299923249, 610523466, 787257402, 693127002, 251117314, 274854186, 132680743, 37459911, 14834957, 356231355, 335781937, 858812500, 458441030, 637311869, 73745211, 791787211, 861578469, 303806301, 600898913, 774940912, 507068751, 899220219, 277356214, 377089866, 89899198, 562096927, 685989640, 69944625, 412794039, 821294229, 573899793, 98368861, 410483038, 506027728, 150314858, 975884181, 748126866, 911792198, 337223145, 759500864, 502300412, 406805122, 167525438, 391836287, 320020089, 866141493, 665536709, 450230733, 409647119, 790920766, 376319592, 758002143, 847823692, 52201469, 322112020, 815885044, 918761827, 62364468, 751740058, 493245527, 498082433, 758828960, 607493212, 289831800, 467744000, 117178299, 156008901, 358090920, 473442205, 706432727, 187103, 101678660, 595372718, 946560762, 904900923, 872198964, 923598946, 93254700, 964102678, 822079129, 853742706, 705540492, 825356904, 616340042, 403197242, 511851652, 959117247, 880360930, 692982960, 744805904, 582350530, 846408292, 251199337, 860645266, 399052838, 367146139, 811071120, 86066388, 537042740, 867961536, 758098684, 235224287, 380599736, 959657936, 203694131, 15459309, 444249517, 230214952, 127024582, 789638186, 771424527, 40829331, 63146714, 59506, 411956640, 110991310, 720172051, 788647540, 667417108, 121734674, 632863051, 55666913, 240211076, 604460690, 801651972, 896855229, 59706928]

For the answer, I sum the ranges: 0: 1, 1: 2, 2: 3, 3: 5, 5: 7, 7: 10, 10: 14, 14: 17, 17: 25, 25: 30, 30: 35, 35: 43, 43: 50, 50: 57, 57: 63, 63: 70, 70: 80, 80: 89, 89: 96, 96: 104, 104: 114, 114: 140

Which gives final array [252675239, 362192384, 382111017, 906999541, 985973648, 1785884511, 1999498815, 2090907870, 2261772903, 2822863790, 3085935096, 3296464738, 3463105325, 3476983466, 3502496909, 4091105787, 4202517658, 4958864982, 5187675555, 5391006507, 5784692340, 10373557896]

• There can be multiple correct solutions but you only accept one. For example in the sample tests: '--|7kg|--------------------|2kg||19kg|--' should equal '--|10kg||3kg|--------------|7kg||11kg|--', and '--|126kg||122kg|--------|123kg||134kg|--' should equal '--|211kg|----------------------|287kg|--'.
  Either specify a total ordering for answers and make the user return the best answer according to the ordering, or make the tests allow all correct answers.

• Also, it seems like you only want to accept an equal number of weights on either side but this is not written anywhere in the description. For example, getting these in the random tests: '--|13kg|------------------|11kg||20kg|--' should equal ':(', and '--------------------------------|13kg|--' should equal ':('.

• In the description, you say "with the heaviest Weight on the left!!!", but both the description and tests expect the heaviest on the right.

Looks good!

Also, I think you may have forgotton to change the sample tests.

Also, would you be able to create a function to do a test?
Instead of having to repeat this everytime:

if not isValidSolution(start, end, solution := find_shortest_path(start, end)):
      failed(start, end, solution)
  else:
      test.assert_equals(True, True)

Makes it a lot easier to maintain.

Seems ok, but you should use test.fail instead of raising an error if the user's solution is incorrect: https://docs.codewars.com/languages/python/codewars-test#pass-and-fail.
(and test.pass_ instead of test.assert_equals(True, True))

Hi, you should resolve issues only after they have actually been resolved :P

The description says both inputs will be prime, but 9991 given in the sample tests is not prime.

There are some inputs that can have multiple valid solutions for example, with the second sample test: [3361, 3371, 3571, 1571, 1579, 1979] should equal [3361, 1361, 1861, 1871, 1879, 1979].

You should probably create a function that checks whether the user's solution is valid, rather than using test.assert_equals.

A bit late, but you can use something like a std::sync::atomic::AtomicU16 or just a static mut u16 as like a question counter, and then just return false when that counter hits a certain value.
The only slight issue is that Rust tests are run in parallel, but I'm assuming only one of the test categories are timing out, so this should be fine.