Since no activity has happened to this kata for over a year, not including this post, I will mark this issue as resolved and an admin could decide if they want to approve this kata because they already know all the rules. If this kata would be disapproved, I will unlist it.
Comparing values is not a novel idea; trivial/map/filter reduce is not a novel idea; sorting a list is not a novel idea. As said by "FArekkusu", awaiting the response from an admin about the situation
As user9644768 said below, "Raise a proper issue of duplicate by linking the potential original kata of which you think this is kata might be duplicate of( and if you're lazy to do that just don't raise issues at all ). The way you've raised this issue is pretty much bogus and opiniated providing no clue whatsover to the author about what exactly is wrong.", this issue is resolved.
What you said isn't right.
For example if someone made a kata about multiples of 3 and someone else made a kata about multiples of 5, you would go around and write "Multiples is not a novel idea. This kata should no way be approved at any point."
There are hundreds of katas that use the same idea. It doesn't matter if the idea isn't novel. What matters is if the kata is novel not the idea.
Example: Search "sorting" and you will see how many katas involve sorting a list
Fixed.
Since no activity has happened to this kata for over a year, not including this post, I will mark this issue as resolved and an admin could decide if they want to approve this kata because they already know all the rules. If this kata would be disapproved, I will unlist it.
Comparing values is not a novel idea; trivial/map/filter reduce is not a novel idea; sorting a list is not a novel idea. As said by "FArekkusu", awaiting the response from an admin about the situation
As user9644768 said below, "Raise a proper issue of duplicate by linking the potential original kata of which you think this is kata might be duplicate of( and if you're lazy to do that just don't raise issues at all ). The way you've raised this issue is pretty much bogus and opiniated providing no clue whatsover to the author about what exactly is wrong.", this issue is resolved.
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
What you said isn't right.
For example if someone made a kata about multiples of 3 and someone else made a kata about multiples of 5, you would go around and write "Multiples is not a novel idea. This kata should no way be approved at any point."
I am not speaking nonsense. When you search "sorting" in katas you will see hundreds of katas involving sorting a list
Why do you keep typing this?
I already told you that it doesn't matter if the idea is novel or not
There are hundreds of katas that use the same idea. It doesn't matter if the idea isn't novel. What matters is if the kata is novel not the idea.
Example: Search "sorting" and you will see how many katas involve sorting a list
Python
Random tests are mandatory for katas
Issues:
The only way to fix these issues is to unpublish
Please use Test.assertDeepEquals instead of Test.assertSimilar in tests
Why do you type that on every beta kata?
Please use new python test framework
Loading more items...