Fixed:D

1. Rename the thirteen_with_one;
2. Correct misstype stuff.

So there is some misstype stuff in the description and such:

1. unusual winning pattern - thirteen with one, 十三幺

I feel like that should be called "Thirteen orphans" (please look here );

2. '鸟,4条,2饼,5饼,8饼,3万,6万,9万,东,南,北,中,发,白',# independeBce <-- independeNce?

3. '东,南,西,北,中,发,白,1万,9万,1饼,9饼,鸟,9条,白',# thirteen_with_seven

Why is it thirteen_with_seven, when in description there's a thirteen with one combination?

Thank you very much!!!:D

1. Now the check points are generated by shuffled list.
2. I add a decorator to validate the patterns.
3. Sorry for my carelessness :(
4. I fixed the css, now you can read discription explicitly.

1. It is stated in the description of unusual winning pattern - independence, 全不靠:

Each tile is belong to {east，south，west，north，middle，rich， blank} and (1，4，7)(million)， (2，5，8)(pancakes), (3,6,9)(worm) THE MILLION，PANCAKES，AND WORM IN PARENTHESES ABOVE ARE INTERCHANGABLE!

But the actual testcase only tested one of the possibilities (always within ['1万', '4万', '7万', '8饼', '2饼', '5饼', '9条', '3条', '6条']). Consider shuffling array a / b before zipping them together, do beware that "1条" might be randomly generated and need to be converted to "鸟".

2. Testcase can and often generate invalid hands: eg: normal [白,5万,9万,4万,9万,6万,3万,9万,9万,白,9万,5万,7万,9万] (six 9万 here), seven pairs [白,白,白,白,白,白,白,白,白,白,白,白,白,白].

3. Off by 1 error while printing the function name, eg. ("hirteen_with_one", "ormal", "nependence", ...)

4. Description is hard to read in light mode due to black background, consider giving them a white font?

Thanks, and very well done

503 Arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrgh! :(

I hate Montana!!!

Urr...Sorry, I have deleted clearity

Fixed.

Sorry, fixed.
Now all '1条' is replace by '鸟'. : )

Description and tests are inconsistent about if there should be a 1条 tile or not. It's not included in the alll variable, but it's in the thirteen variable, but not in the thirteen test case, but in the independence test case...

In that case, I have to remove those tiles used in Kong, then check for winning.

That is correct, just want to know if the test cases would include the case of having more than 14 tiles due to Kong.

Kong moves tiles outside your hand. It also requires you to draw one tile, so you wouldn't be having the same tiles anymore.

(Also, it is perfectly fine to have a winning hand with 4 of a kind. Typically that's one of the reasons you don't Kong even if you can.)

Did I need to consider Kong(杠)?

It will change the amount of tiles to win.