if you're talking about mine, not really. it doesn't spoil the task but i spoilered it on the side of caution since it mentions a library name

Do I need to solve this kata to see that last remark?

Actually, language used in comments on the platform is my business.

I mean who are you? I doubt you have some high authority to order me to do something even when the talk wasn't forwarded to you in the first place. Minding your business would be better, wouldn't it?

Try to find better words to express your frustration next time, would you.

I'm frustrated rather than amazed, I solved this question with alot of lines and when I decided to see the answers that guy somehow solved it in one line of code using some weird libraries that doesn't even work on my VS code. So OFC I am confused as hell

What happened so amazing to make you forget proper language?

• rand_ascii_remove_count's return type is accidentally set to bool rather than std::size_t
• Consider raising the upper bound for dist_ascii_remove_count from 25 to 26 (minor boost in coverage)
• Having alternating sets of 25 valid and invalid random tests is a bit of a predictable pattern. It could be exploited, although I doubt someone is willing to go through all that trouble. It's up to you whether you think this a valid concern; if so, consider shuffling to intersperse valid and invalid tests.

.

merged :)

Oops, overlooked that. Fixed here

forgot to check for tables, they're misaligned actually: image

looks fine, approved